|
Education
|
|
|
Robert W. Knolton has a wealth of knowledge and trial experience in his practice area of Litigation and has provided professional, ethical and high-quality legal work and advice to his clients for more than 45 years. His ultimate goal is to keep his clients fully informed in all aspects of their case and the law, while simultaneously keeping legal fees and expenses to a minimum. While most cases are settled without actual trial, he is a skillful negotiator in achieving the best results for his clients in a cost-effective and timely manner. Mr. Knolton represents his clients with the utmost integrity in litigation matters at both state and appellate levels. He is admitted to practice in all state and federal courts in Tennessee. His broad litigation experience includes:
The Best Lawyers in America, a highly regarded peer-review publication, has included Mr. Knolton in its list for Workers' Compensation litigation every year since 1995. Mr. Knolton has significant health care law experience and represents hospitals in peer review and credentialing issues, including the development of medical staff bylaws. He also represents clients in litigation of medical malpractice and workers' compensation claims against hospitals and has served as the hearing officer of hospitals in due process and peer review hearing. Representative Cases All of the following cases were published. Crook v. Mid-South Transfer, 499 S.W.2d 255 (Tenn. App. 1973) This case involved fire and warehouse bailment issues. Recent Presentations Mr. Knolton frequently lectures in seminars concerning hospital and health care issues, as well as workers' compensation. Representative Matters Mr. Knolton represented a local area hospital in a very challenging death case which arose out of a medical malpractice claim against several physicians and the hospital, his client. It was a very serious case and one with a potential risk of large monetary judgments against one or more of several defendants. After a full week of trial, the jury found in favor of all the defendants. Several years ago, Mr. Knolton defended an insured of one of the insurance companies he represents. The plaintiff had very significant injuries due to an automobile accident involving Mr. Knolton's client, and the insurance company offered a settlement which was ultimately refused by the plaintiff. After a two-day trial, the jury found in favor of his client, and the plaintiff did not recover any award for his injuries and damages. Of Note
|